Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου
-
▼
2020
(289)
-
▼
Αυγούστου
(73)
-
▼
Αυγ 27
(17)
- Cancers
- High Altitude Medicine & Biology - Table of Cont...
- Eczema moisturizers: Allergenic Pote
- COVID‐19 und Auswirkungen auf dermatologische und...
- Asymptomatic chyluria presenting with fat-fl
- Evaluation of the Toxicity of Supernatant Culture...
- Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
- Dysphagia - Rehabilitation
-
▼
Αυγ 27
(17)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (28)
-
▼
Αυγούστου
(73)
-
►
2019
(9071)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (19)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (54)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (3642)
- ► Ιανουαρίου (3200)
-
►
2018
(39872)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (3318)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (3683)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (2693)
- ► Ιανουαρίου (3198)
-
►
2017
(41099)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (3127)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (2173)
-
►
2016
(13807)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (700)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (600)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (1350)
- ► Ιανουαρίου (1400)
-
►
2015
(1500)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (1450)
Ετικέτες
Σάββατο 21 Ιουλίου 2018
Mechanisms of acute and chronic pain after surgery: update from findings in experimental animal models
https://ift.tt/2LdcxRi
Παρασκευή 20 Ιουλίου 2018
Pitfalls in anaphylaxis
https://ift.tt/2uR91ko
Methodological empiricism and the choice of measurement models in social sciences
Abstract
Realism is generally assumed as the correct position with regards to psychological research and the measurement of psychological attributes in psychometrics. Borsboom et al. (Psychological Review, 110(2), 203–219 2003), for instance, argued that the choice of a reflective measurement model necessarily implies a commitment to the existence of psychological constructs as well as a commitment to the belief that empirical testing of measurement models can justify their correspondence with real causal structures. Hood (Erkenntnis, 78(4):739–761 2013) deemphasized Borsboom et al.'s position and argued that the choice of a reflective measurement model does not necessarily require ontological commitments, though, in his view, it does necessitate a commitment to minimal epistemic realism. Although these arguments are formulated with regard to psychological research, they can actually be generalized to other disciplines in social sciences that use similar methodologies and statistical techniques. In Hood's opinion, empiricism does not suffice to provide an adequate account of the choice of reflective measurement models given that this choice requires an appeal to causal explanations. In this paper, we argue against Hood and answer this challenge, providing epistemic foundations for social science research that do not appeal to realism.
https://ift.tt/2uOSdL1
Intrathoracic scapular dislocation following lung cancer resection

https://ift.tt/2uSoIIa
Concomittant fibrous dysplasia with aneurysmal bone cyst formation within the skull, humerus and rib

https://ift.tt/2LmMFld
Case report: irreducible medial subtalar dislocation with incarcerated anterior talar head fracture in a young patient

https://ift.tt/2JG9Wtt
Food protein-induced eosinophilic enteritis with intestinal stricture in a neonate: a case report and review of the literature

https://ift.tt/2LxrPQh