Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου

Δευτέρα 7 Αυγούστου 2017

Endoscopic DCR using bipedicled interlacing mucosal flaps

Objective

Obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct is a relatively common condition that affects patients of all ages, races, and sexes. The surgical gold standard for complete nasolacrimal duct obstruction and dacryocystitis is dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). The purpose of this study was to describe a novel, bipedicled interlacing mucosal sparing flap technique for endoscopic DCR (eDCR).

Methods

A posteriorly based mucosal flap over the fundus is combined with a novel, anteriorly based mucosal flap over the intraosseus portion of the nasolacrimal duct (NLD). This exposes a wide area of the maxillary bone, allowing for exposure and identification of the NLD/sac complex in a safer, more inferior position. The interlacing mucosal flaps may be replaced at the conclusion of the procedure, thereby minimizing bone exposure and maintaining excellent long-term patency.

Results

The authors have utilized this technique in 55 procedures with 100% positive identification of the NLD and lacrimal sac, 0% complication rate, 100% anatomical patency rate, and 96.4% success rate after a minimal follow-up of 6 months.

Discussion

The bipedicled interlacing flap technique for eDCR provides for safe and reproducible identification of the NLD and lacrimal sac while minimizing bone exposure and restenosis rate.

Conclusion

The bipedicled interlacing flap technique for eDCR provides for safe and reproducible identification of the NLD and lacrimal sac while minimizing bone exposure and restenosis rate.

Level of Evidence

N/A Laryngoscope, 2017



http://ift.tt/2vA0Pre

Adjuvant photodynamic therapy in head and neck cancer after tumor-positive resection margins

Objective

In case of close or positive resection margins after oncological resection in head and neck surgery, additional treatment is necessary. When conventional options are exhausted, photodynamic therapy (PDT) can play a role in achieving clear margins. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of PDT as adjuvant therapy next to surgery with positive resection margins. The role of the time interval between surgery and PDT on survival outcomes also was investigated.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort analysis.

Methods

Adjuvant PDT was performed in patients with a malignancy in the head and neck region with close or positive resection margins who were not eligible for conventional treatment options. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints were disease-free survival, overall survival, and optimal time interval between surgery and PDT.

Results

Fifty-four patients were treated with surgery followed by meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin-mediated PDT. There was a large diversity in tumor location and histopathology, as well as in time interval between surgery and PDT. The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 30%; 2-year disease-free survival rate was 28%; and 2-year overall survival was 51%. Disease-free survival was significantly better when the time interval between surgery and PDT was ≥ 6 weeks (P = 0.02).

Conclusion

PDT can be applied as adjuvant therapy after surgery in cases of a malignancy with close or positive tumor resection margins. However, the clinical benefits are yet to be determined. There is a significantly better disease-free survival with a time interval between surgery and PDT of minimal 6 weeks.

Level of Evidence

4. Laryngoscope, 2017



http://ift.tt/2vzljjV

Use of standardized letters of recommendation for otolaryngology head and neck surgery residency and the impact of gender

Objectives

To evaluate gender-based differences in narrative letters of recommendation (NLORs) and standardized letters of recommendation (SLORs) submitted for applicants to an otolaryngology head and neck surgery (OHNS) residency program.

Study Design

Retrospective review.

Methods

Nine hundred fifty-eight letters of recommendation (LORs) submitted to one OHNS program in 2013 to 2014 were analyzed.

Results

NLORs (n = 590) and SLORs (n = 368) were reviewed. Male writers composed over 85% of all LORs. Compared with male writers, female writers of LORs were more likely to compose a letter of minimal assurance (P < 0.025). Female writers of SLORs were more likely to rank applicants higher in communication skills (P < 0.035) and match potential (P < 0.045). Analysis of LORs by applicant gender revealed that female applicants were more likely than male applicants to be described as team players (P < 0.025) and less likely to receive a letter of minimal assurance (P < 0.001). Compared with SLORs, NLORs written for male applicants were more likely to reference their leadership potential (P < 0.001). Female applicants were less likely to be described as "bright" (P < 0.001) and more likely to have their appearance mentioned (P < 0.03) in NLORs when compared to SLORs.

Conclusion

Although we found that SLORs reduce gender biases compared to NLORs, there remain significant differences in how female and male applicants are described. Greater awareness of historical biases likely has contributed to more equitable letter writing, although impactful gender biases remain when reviewing applicants.

Level of Evidence

NA. Laryngoscope, 2017



http://ift.tt/2vh5AmP

Allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: a systematic overview of systematic reviews

The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) is developing Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) for Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC). To inform the development of recommendations, we...

http://ift.tt/2vIwjuG

Effect of Booster Vaccination with Inactivated Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus on Neutralizing Antibody Response in Mammary Secretions

Viral Immunology , Vol. 0, No. 0.


http://ift.tt/2foW65f

Platelets Modulate Innate Immune Response Against Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus In Vitro

Viral Immunology , Vol. 0, No. 0.


http://ift.tt/2hEZ8TG

Role of Ultrasound in Predicting Tumor Invasiveness in Follicular Variant of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

access_no.gif

Thyroid , Vol. 0, No. 0.


http://ift.tt/2uB5Xa7