Publication date: Available online 5 August 2016
Source:Clinical Therapeutics
Author(s): Kwang-il Kim, Mi-Seung Shin, Sang-Hyun Ihm, Ho-Joong Youn, Ki-Chul Sung, Shung Chull Chae, Chang-Wook Nam, Hong Seog Seo, Seong-Mi Park, Moo-Yong Rhee, Moo Hyun Kim, Kwang Soo Cha, Yong-Jin Kim, Jae-Joong Kim, Kook Jin Chun, Byung-Su Yoo, Sungha Park, Eun-Seok Shin, Dong-Soo Kim, Doo Il Kim, Kye Hun Kim, Seung-Jae Joo, Jin-Ok Jeong, Jinho Shin, Cheol Ho Kim
PurposeThe goal of this study was to evaluate whether the blood pressure–lowering efficacy of fimasartan/amlodipine combination therapy was superior to that of fimasartan monotherapy after 8 weeks of treatment in patients with hypertension who had failed to respond adequately to fimasartan monotherapy.MethodsThis trial was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, Phase III clinical study. Patients who failed to respond after 4 weeks of treatment with 60 mg daily of fimasartan (sitting systolic blood pressure [SiSBP]) ≥140 mm Hg) were randomized to receive either daily fimasartan 60 mg or fimasartan/amlodipine 60 mg/10 mg. The primary efficacy end point was the change in SiSBP from baseline to week 8. Secondary end points included the change in SiSBP from baseline to week 4, the changes in sitting diastolic blood pressure from baseline to weeks 4 and 8, and the response rate (SiSBP <140 mm Hg or decrease in SiSBP ≥20 mm Hg) or control rate (SiSBP <140 mm Hg) at week 8. Treatment-emergent adverse events were also assessed.FindingsOf 143 patients randomized to treatment, 137 patients who had available efficacy data were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 59.1 (8.9) years, and 100 (73.0%) were male. Baseline SiSBP and sitting diastolic blood pressure were 150.6 (9.2) mm Hg and 91.7 (8.6) mm Hg, respectively. In the fimasartan/amlodipine combination group, a greater reduction in SiSBP from baseline to week 8 was observed compared with the fimasartan group (7.8 [13.3] mm Hg in the fimasartan group vs 20.5 [14.6] mm Hg in the fimasartan/amlodipine group; P < 0.0001). This reduction was observed after 4 weeks. The mean SiSBP changes from baseline to week 4 were 8.1 (15.8) mm Hg in the fimasartan group and 20.1 (14.7) mm Hg in the fimasartan/amlodipine group (P < 0.0001). At week 8, the response rate was significantly higher in the fimasartan/amlodipine (82.1%) group than in the fimasartan (32.9%) group (P < 0.0001). The control rate at week 8 was also higher in the fimasartan/amlodipine (79.1%) group than in the fimasartan (31.4%) group (P < 0.0001). Adverse drug reactions were observed in 9 patients (6.3%), with no significant differences between treatment groups. There were no serious adverse events associated with the study drugs.ImplicationsFimasartan/amlodipine combination therapy exhibited superior efficacy in reducing blood pressure, with no increase in adverse drug reactions, compared with fimasartan monotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02152306.
from #MedicinebyAlexandrosSfakianakis via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2aun6bz
via IFTTT
Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου
-
►
2020
(289)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (28)
-
►
2019
(9071)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (19)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (54)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (3642)
- ► Ιανουαρίου (3200)
-
►
2018
(39872)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (3318)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (3683)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (2693)
- ► Ιανουαρίου (3198)
-
►
2017
(41099)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (3127)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (2173)
-
▼
2016
(13807)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (700)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (600)
-
▼
Αυγούστου
(1550)
-
▼
Αυγ 06
(50)
- A comprehensive treatment for peritoneal metastase...
- Assessment of metastatic risk of gastric GIST base...
- Calendar
- Male sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surger...
- Influence of sawdust on peak expiratory flow rate ...
- Comparative study of simple auditory reaction time...
- Evaluation of the effects of low-intensity laser r...
- A study on the anticonvulsant activity of Withania...
- Scalable histopathological image analysis via supe...
- Influence of Androgen Deprivation Therapy on the U...
- Filtration Isolation of Nucleic Acids: A Simple an...
- Microglial role in the development of chronic pain.
- The Clinicopathological correlation in suspected c...
- Attitude and practice of primary care physician to...
- Protective Role of Liriodendrin in Sepsis-Induced ...
- How do different delivery schedules of tailored we...
- Spatio-Temporal Epidemiological Analysis of Livest...
- A Survey of Graduates of Combined Emergency Medici...
- β-asarone increases MEF2D and TH levels and reduce...
- Prostaglandin D2 signaling mediated by the CRTH2 r...
- Reduced locomotor activity and exploratory behavio...
- On the feasibility of the Chevron Notch Beam metho...
- Introduction to Special Issue on Mitochondrial Red...
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase III...
- Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Ca...
- The Effect of Unenhanced MRI on the Surgeons’ Deci...
- Challenges in epilepsy-associated tumors
- Detecting fatigue thresholds from electromyographi...
- Influence of timing variability between motor unit...
- Cancer Risk Factor Knowledge Among Young Adults
- Selective 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced protoporph...
- Sleep apnea is associated with an increased risk o...
- A formal framework to represent spatial knowledge
- The Importance of Having Sulfur
- Molecular insights of organochlorine biocide-induc...
- A rare case of intervertebral internal hernia
- Sports hernia repair with adductor tenotomy
- No inequalities in survival from colorectal cancer...
- Involvement of Protein Kinase C-δ in the Realizati...
- Effect of Circulation Parameters on Functional Sta...
- Clinical Morphological Studies of Myelofibrosis wi...
- Relationship between Morphofunctional Changes in O...
- Oxidative Stress and Catalase Gene
- Experimental Evaluation of Biodegradable Film Comp...
- Effect of Fluoxetine on Neurogenesis in Hippocampa...
- Expression of Cytokine Genes and Growth Factors in...
- Serological Analysis of Immunogenic Properties of ...
- Antiproliferative Effects of Modified Bioflavonoid...
- Physiological Features of Perigonadal Adipose Tiss...
- Physicians’ identification of the need for palliat...
-
▼
Αυγ 06
(50)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (1350)
- ► Ιανουαρίου (1400)
-
►
2015
(1500)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (1450)
Ετικέτες
Σάββατο 6 Αυγούστου 2016
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fimasartan/Amlodipine Combined Therapy Versus Fimasartan Monotherapy in Patients With Essential Hypertension Unresponsive to Fimasartan Monotherapy
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου