Publication date: Available online 20 January 2018
Source:Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Author(s): Eduardo Macoto Kosugi, Leonardo Balsalobre, João Mangussi Gomes, Miguel Soares Tepedino, Daniel Marcus San da Silva, Erika Mucciolo Cabernite, Diego Hermann, Aldo Cassol Stamm
IntroductionSince the introduction of nasal endoscopy into the field of Otorhinolaryngology, the treatment paradigm for cases of severe epistaxis has shifted toward early and precise identification of the bleeding site. Although severe epistaxis is usually considered to arise from posterior bleeding, an arterial vascular pedicle in the superior portion of the nasal septum, around the middle turbinate axilla projection, frequently has been observed. That vascular pedicle was named the S-point.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to describe the S-point and report cases of severe epistaxis originating from it.MethodsA retrospective case series study was conducted. Nine patients with spontaneous severe epistaxis, where the S-point was identified as the source of bleeding, were treated between March 2016 and March 2017.ResultsMale predominance (77.8%) with age average of 59.3 years old were reported. Most cases presented comorbidities (88.9%) and were not taking acetylsalicylic acid (66.7%). A predominance of left sided involvement (55.6%) anteroposterior bleeding being the principal initial presentation (77.8%) was seen. Six patients (66.7%) presented with hemoglobin levels below 10g/dL, and four (44.4%) required blood transfusion. Cauterization of S-point was performed in all patients, with complete resolution of bleeding. No patient experienced recurrence of severe epistaxis.ConclusionThe S-point, a novel source of spontaneous severe epistaxis, is reported, and its cauterization was effective and safe. Otolaryngologists must actively seek this site of bleeding in cases of severe epistaxis.
http://ift.tt/2mYRzXW
Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου
-
►
2020
(289)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (28)
-
►
2019
(9071)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (19)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (54)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (3642)
- ► Ιανουαρίου (3200)
-
▼
2018
(39872)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (3318)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (3683)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (2693)
-
▼
Ιανουαρίου
(3198)
-
▼
Ιαν 20
(20)
- Breaking paradigms in severe epistaxis: the import...
- Intratidal Analysis of Intraoperative Respiratory ...
- “Mirror, Mirror on the Wall”: Learning From Reflec...
- The Syringe Driver: Continuous Subcutaneous Infusi...
- Learning From Human Factors Can Make Anesthesia Ev...
- A Novel Approach to Synthesize the Evidence on Ana...
- Alkalinized Lidocaine Preloaded Endotracheal Tube ...
- MicroRNAs as Clinical Biomarkers and Therapeutic T...
- Sugammadex and Oral Contraceptives: Is It Time for...
- Pediatric Anesthesiology Fellows’ Perception of Qu...
- Ischemic Preconditioning and the Role of Antifibri...
- Emergency General Surgery: Time for Anesthesiology...
- Developing Reflective Practice: A Guide for Medica...
- New Diabetes Medications Raise New Perioperative C...
- Not All Calcium Formulations Are Alike
- “That’s Not What I Said”: Seeking Fidelity in Cita...
- Disparities in Anesthesia Care
- Informed Consent and Cognitive Dysfunction After N...
- A multi-centre, open, investigator initiated phase...
- Severe cutaneous adverse reactions due to inapprop...
-
▼
Ιαν 20
(20)
-
►
2017
(41099)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (3127)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (2173)
-
►
2016
(13807)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (700)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (600)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (1350)
- ► Ιανουαρίου (1400)
-
►
2015
(1500)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (1450)
Ετικέτες
Σάββατο 20 Ιανουαρίου 2018
Breaking paradigms in severe epistaxis: the importance of looking for the S-point
Alkalinized Lidocaine Preloaded Endotracheal Tube Cuffs Reduce Emergence Cough After Brief Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial
http://ift.tt/2F17QCf
MicroRNAs as Clinical Biomarkers and Therapeutic Tools in Perioperative Medicine
http://ift.tt/2F18Wy1
Pediatric Anesthesiology Fellows’ Perception of Quality of Attending Supervision and Medical Errors
http://ift.tt/2F17HPd
Informed Consent and Cognitive Dysfunction After Noncardiac Surgery in the Elderly
http://ift.tt/2EWYnfy
A multi-centre, open, investigator initiated phase IV clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ingenol mebutate gel, 0.015% on the face and scalp, and 0.05% on the trunk and extremities, in Korean patients with actinic keratosis (PERFECT)
Abstract
Background
Ingenol mebutate gel is a novel, field-directed topical treatment for actinic keratosis (AK). Most pivotal studies have targeted Western populations. No clinical study has been conducted to investigate its efficacy and safety in Asian populations.
Objectives
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ingenol mebutate gel for treating AK of face/scalp and trunk/extremities in a large Asian (Korean) population.
Methods
In this multi-centre, open-label, interventional, parallel group, prospective phase 4 study (PERFECT, NCT02716714), the eligible subjects were allocated into either the face/scalp or the trunk/extremities group, according to their selected treatment area location. After application of ingenol mebutate gel, the subjects were followed-up for 6 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was complete clearance (CC) rate of AK lesions in the selected treatment area on Day 57. The quality of life was evaluated using Skindex-29. Safety endpoints included local skin responses, scar, pigmentation, pain, and adverse events.
Results
In total, 78.1% (95% CI: 66.86–86.92%) of subjects had CC on day 57, with 76.6% (95% CI: 64.31–86.25%) in face/scalp group and 88.9% (95% CI: 51.75–99.72%) in trunk/extremities group. Among them, the CC rate was sustained in 88.9% (48/54 subjects, 95% CI: 77.37–95.81%) on Month 6. The local skin responses significantly increased 1 day after the treatment compared to baseline, and decreased afterwards. Among the total subjects, 7.8% (6/77 subjects) had hyperpigmentation on the application area. Scars were not reported.
Conclusions
Ingenol mebutate is effective for the treatment of AK in Asians, with tolerable safety profiles.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
http://ift.tt/2DxXZXA
Severe cutaneous adverse reactions due to inappropriate medication use
Summary
Backgroud
The proportion of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) that could be avoided if medication use was consistent with good medical practice is unknown.
Objectives
To estimate the proportion of SCARs related to inappropriate medication use.
Methods
Retrospective study of all validated SCARs collected in a French registry between 2003 and 2016. For each case, all plausible drugs suspected to induce SCARs (i.e., not just the drug regarded as "the most probable") were considered regarding three causes of preventability: (1) prescription for an inappropriate indication, (2) unintentional rechallenge despite a previous allergy to the drug, or (3) self-medication with prescription medicines.
Results
602 cases were included in the analyses. Antibiotics, anticonvulsants and allopurinol were the drugs most frequently involved, accounting for more than 50% of all cases. All suspected medications were considered appropriately used for 417 of the 602 individuals included in the study population (69.3%, 95% CI [65.6-73.0]),and inappropriately used. for 144 individuals (23.9% [20.5-27.3]).. These inappropriate uses were mainly due to prescriptions for inappropriate indication (65.8% [58.4-73.2]) or unintentional rechallenge (20.9% [14.6-27.2]). Allopurinol and cotrimoxazole were the drugs most frequently involved in inappropriate indications (accounting for 51.9% [42.3-61.5] and 13.5% [6.9-20.1] of cases, respectively). Antibiotics were the largest group involved in unintentional rechallenge. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs available on prescription were most involved in inappropriate self-medication.
Conclusions
Our results underline the need for respecting the appropriate indication of drugs to reduce the incidence of SCARs. All efforts to reduce unintentional rechallenge also seem to be necessary preventive measures.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
http://ift.tt/2EZMViW