Improving margin revision: Characterization of tumor bed margins in early oral tongue cancer

Publication date: Available online 1 November 2017
Source:Oral Oncology
Author(s): Arpan V. Prabhu, Charles D. Sturgis, Chi Lai, Jessica H. Maxwell, Mihai Merzianu, Juan C. Hernandez-Prera, Bibianna Purgina, Lester D.R. Thompson, Madalina Tuluc, Xiu Yang, Raja R. Seethala, Robert L. Ferris, Simion I. Chiosea
ObjectivesTo improve margin revision, this study characterizes the number, fragmentation, and orientation of tumor bed margins (TBM) in patients with pT1-2 pN0 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral tongue.Materials and MethodsPathology reports (n=346) were reviewed. TBM parameters were indexed. In Group 1 patients all margins were obtained from the glossectomy specimen and there were no TBM. In Revision Group/Group 2 (n=103), tumor bed was sampled to revise suboptimal margins identified by examination of the glossectomy specimen. In Group 3 (n=124), TBM were obtained before examination of the glossectomy specimen.Results and ConclusionsFewer TBMs were obtained per patient in Group 2 compared to Group 3 (57/103, 55% of patients with <3 vs. 117/124, 94%, ≥3 TBMs, respectively). The new margin surface was more frequently indicated in Group 2 compared to Group 3 (59/103, 57%, vs. 19/124, 15%, p<.001). If glossectomy specimen margins are accepted as the reference standard, then the TBM was 15% sensitive in Group 2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7–29) and 32% sensitive in Group 3 (95% CI, 15–55). TBM fragmentation (23/103, 22% vs. 42/124, 34%) and frozen vs. permanent discrepancies (8/103, 3% vs. 3/124, 2%) were similar between Groups 2 and 3. The new margin surface was not indicated in 6 of 11 cases with discrepant frozen vs. permanent pathology findings, precluding judgment on final margin status. To facilitate the assessment of final margins, TBM should be represented by one tissue fragment with a marked new margin surface.

Graphical abstract

http://ift.tt/2zokxIV