Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου

Σάββατο 16 Ιουνίου 2018

Risk of plate removal in free flap reconstruction of the mandible

alertIcon.gif

Publication date: August 2018
Source:Oral Oncology, Volume 83
Author(s): C. Burton Wood, Justin R. Shinn, Shaunak N. Amin, Sarah L. Rohde, Robert J. Sinard
ObjectivesTo evaluate the factors associated with need for removal of fixation plates in mandibular free flap reconstruction.MethodsThis retrospective cohort analysis reviews patients undergoing mandibular free flap reconstruction at a tertiary care center from 2005 to 2016. Patients requiring removal of fixation plates were identified through electronic medical records. Factors including demographics, adjuvant therapy, surgical site infection (SSI) and fistula rates were compared. Removal rates based on flap type were determined.ResultsBetween 2004 and 2016, 307 patients underwent osteocutaneous mandibular free flap reconstruction. 83 required removal of their fixation plates (27%). Age, tobacco use, and BMI were similar between patients requiring removal versus not requiring removal. Primary indications for removal were plate exposure (n = 41), and/or chronic drainage (n = 31), infection (n = 25), and pain (n = 17). Patients undergoing removal were significantly more likely to have had adjuvant radiation therapy (OR 2.09, CI 1.82–3.81), surgical site infection (OR 13.9, CI 5.15–43.2), and post-operative fistula (OR 13.0, 6.85–24.8). 35% of all fibula flaps (n = 52), 21% of osteocutaneous radial forearm (n = 21), and 11% of osteocutaneous scapular flaps (n = 6) required removal. 90% of patients (n = 75) had resolution of their symptoms following hardware removal.ConclusionSurgical site infection and fistula are strongly associated with the need for plate removal. Fibular free flaps carry the highest rate of plate removal. Plate removal leads to resolution of plate-associated symptoms in a majority of cases.



https://ift.tt/2JYHRSj

Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

Δημοσίευση σχολίου