This article in our point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) series discusses the benefits of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) for the regional anesthesiologist and pain specialist. Focused cardiac US is an important tool for all anesthesiologists assessing patients with critical conditions such as shock and cardiac arrest. However, given that ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia is emerging as the new standard of care, there is an expanding role for ultrasound in the perioperative setting for regional anesthesiologists to help improve patient assessment and management. In addition to providing valuable insight into cardiac physiology (preload, afterload, and myocardial contractility), FoCUS can also be used either to assess patients at risk of complications related to regional anesthetic technique or to improve management of patients undergoing regional anesthesia care. Preoperatively, FoCUS can be used to assess patients for significant valvular disease, such as severe aortic stenosis or derangements in volume status before induction of neuraxial anesthesia. Intraoperatively, FoCUS can help differentiate among complications related to regional anesthesia, including high spinal or local anesthetic toxicity resulting in hemodynamic instability or cardiac arrest. Postoperatively, FoCUS can help diagnose and manage common yet life-threatening complications such as pulmonary embolism or derangements in volume status. In this article, we introduce to the regional anesthesiologist interested in learning FoCUS the basic views (subcostal 4-chamber, subcostal inferior vena cava, parasternal short axis, parasternal long axis, and apical 4-chamber), as well as the relevant sonoanatomy. We will also use the I-AIM (Indication, Acquisition, Interpretation, and Medical decision making) framework to describe the clinical circumstances where FoCUS can help identify and manage obvious pathology relevant to the regional anesthesiologist and pain specialist, specifically severe aortic stenosis, hypovolemia, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, and massive pulmonary embolism. Copyright (C) 2017 by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.
http://ift.tt/2v8S9Xy
Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου
-
►
2020
(289)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (28)
-
►
2019
(9071)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (19)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (54)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (3642)
- ► Ιανουαρίου (3200)
-
►
2018
(39872)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (3318)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (3683)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (2693)
- ► Ιανουαρίου (3198)
-
▼
2017
(41099)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (3127)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (2173)
-
▼
Αυγούστου
(2133)
-
▼
Αυγ 06
(22)
- CORRIGENDUM
- Table of Contents
- Editorial Board
- CORRIGENDUM
- Sleep in Patients with Chronic Migraine
- Doing Mastoidectomy Along with Tympanic Membrane R...
- Endoscopic Treatment of Sphenoid Sinus Mucocele: C...
- Anti-glomerular basement membrane glomerulonephrit...
- A comparison of weekly paclitaxel and cetuximab wi...
- The difficult management of radio-incuced head and...
- Χωρίς τίτλο
- The Technology of Processed Electroencephalogram M...
- Atlas of Peripheral Regional Anesthesia Anatomy an...
- Perioperative Drill-Based Crisis Management.
- Reduction in Operating Room Plasma Waste After Evi...
- An Appraisal of the Carlisle-Stouffer-Fisher Metho...
- Mortality, Geriatric, and Nongeriatric Surgical Ri...
- Perioperative Considerations for the Use of Sodium...
- Do advanced glycation end-products cause food alle...
- Component resolved diagnostics for hymenoptera ven...
- Cadaveric Study of the Articular Branches of the S...
- Focused Cardiac Ultrasound for the Regional Anesth...
-
▼
Αυγ 06
(22)
-
►
2016
(13807)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (700)
- ► Σεπτεμβρίου (600)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου (1350)
- ► Ιανουαρίου (1400)
-
►
2015
(1500)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου (1450)
Ετικέτες
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου