Prognostic value of c-MET in head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data

Publication date: November 2017
Source:Oral Oncology, Volume 74
Author(s): Petr Szturz, Marie Budíková, Jan B. Vermorken, Ivana Horová, Břetislav Gál, Eric Raymond, Armand de Gramont, Sandrine Faivre
ObjectivesThe hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (c-MET) ligand/receptor axis has been implicated in pathogenesis of malignant diseases including squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Overexpression of c-MET has been reported as a common molecular abnormality in SCCHN, although its prognostic and predictive value remains to be validated.MethodsWe systematically searched literature for studies evaluating c-MET expression on immunohistochemistry in newly diagnosed, non-metastatic SCCHN. The c-MET expressing cases were classified into three categories according to predefined cut-off values for positivity. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of c-MET expression and its relationship with selected clinicopathological variables.ResultsTwenty-eight studies with 2019 cases were included. Relative frequencies of c-MET expression above cut-off levels I, II, and III were 81.8%, 63.8%, and 46.2%, respectively. Differences between these three values were statistically significant (p<1.0×10⁻⁶). Above cut-off level II, c-MET positivity was associated with worse overall survival (p=4.0×10⁻⁶), positive nodal status (p=1.0×10⁻⁴), higher disease stage (p=7.0×10⁻⁴), older age (p=2.1×10⁻³), disease recurrence (p=2.0×10⁻²), and primary tumour localization in the oral cavity (p=2.3×10⁻²). Above cut-off level III, c-MET positivity was associated with worse disease-free or progression-free survival (p=9.0×10⁻⁶), p16 negativity (p=2.4×10⁻⁴), worse overall survival (p=4.0×10⁻⁴), positive epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status (p=7.2×10⁻⁴), and larger primary tumours (p=4.6×10⁻³).ConclusionIn SCCHN, immunohistochemical overexpression of c-MET above cut-off levels III and particularly II was associated with inferior survival outcomes and advanced disease. Moreover, it represents a promising predictive biomarker for c-MET targeting, yet the optimal scoring method remains to be defined.



http://ift.tt/2xICW12