Background:
We present our experience in patients with hematologic malignancy and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam.
Materials/methods:We performed a single-center case-control study including all patients with hematologic malignancy and P. aeruginosa infection treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam (study group) and compared them with similar patients not treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam (control group) to assess safety and efficacy.
Results:Nineteen cases and 38 controls were analyzed. Cases were younger (45.6 y vs 57.6 y, p=0.012) and less frequently had bacteremia (52.6% vs 86.8%, p=0.008). They also had a worse MASCC score (10.2 vs 16.1, p=0.0001), more hospital-acquired infections (78.9% vs 47.4%, p=0.013), and more XDR P. aeruginosa (47.4% vs 21.1%, p=0.015).
Cases received a median of 14 days (7-18) of ceftolozane-tazobactam (monotherapy in 11 cases [57.9.6%]). Ceftolozane-tazobactam was mostly used as targeted therapy (16; 84.2%) because of resistance (9; 47.4%), failure (4; 21.1%), and toxicity (3; 15.8%). Ten cases had bacteremia (52.6%). The sources were pneumonia (26.3%), catheter-related bacteremia (21.1%), primary bacteremia (21.1%), perianal/genital (15.7%), urinary (10.5%), and skin/soft tissue infection (5.3%). No toxicity was attributed to ceftolozane/tazobactam. More than 60% had neutropenia, and 15.8% fulfilled the criteria for sepsis.
There were no significant differences in clinical cure at day 14 (89.5% vs 71.1%, p=0.183) or recurrence (15.8% vs 10.5%, p=0.675). Thirty-day mortality was lower among cases (5.3% vs 28.9%, p=0.045).
Conclusions:Ceftolozane-tazobactam was well tolerated and at least as effective as other alternatives for P. aeruginosa infection in patients with hematologic malignancy, including neutropenic patients with sepsis caused by XDR strains.
https://ift.tt/2C4ogLF
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου