Monitoring What is Real: the Effects of Modality and Action on Accuracy and Type of Reality Monitoring Error

Publication date: Available online 2 July 2016
Source:Cortex
Author(s): Jane R. Garrison, Rebecca Bond, Emma Gibbard, Marcia K. Johnson, Jon S. Simons
Reality monitoring refers to processes involved in distinguishing internally generated information from information presented in the external world, an activity thought to be based, in part, on assessment of activated features such as the amount and type of cognitive operations and perceptual content. Impairment in reality monitoring has been implicated in symptoms of mental illness and associated more widely with the occurrence of anomalous perceptions as well as false memories and beliefs. In the present experiment, the cognitive mechanisms of reality monitoring were probed in healthy individuals using a task that investigated the effects of stimulus modality (auditory vs. visual) and the type of action undertaken during encoding (thought vs. speech) on subsequent source memory. There was reduced source accuracy for auditory stimuli compared with visual, and when encoding was accompanied by thought as opposed to speech, and a greater rate of externalization than internalization errors that was stable across factors. Interpreted within the source monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993), the results are consistent with the greater prevalence of clinically observed auditory than visual reality discrimination failures. The significance of these findings is discussed in light of theories of hallucinations, delusions and confabulation.



from #MedicinebyAlexandrosSfakianakis via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/29kF5G0
via IFTTT